For my research project I strive to better understand the concept of affirmative action, as it currently exists in Brazilian society. The myth of racial democracy that has so long been legitimized in Brazil provides an image of racial harmony that masks over racial segregation, reducing the race issue to one of class conflict, which typically results in attempts to resolve the issue through race neutral income distribution policies. With the introduction and adoption of affirmative action policies in Brazil, the public debate has taken a shift in tone to reflect viewpoints standing in opposition to racial democracy.
I would like to conduct my research in the cities of Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paolo, and Salvador in Brazil on current understandings and perceptions of affirmative action, focusing in particular on education at the university level. My hypothesis supposes that the more people believe in the myth of racial democracy, the less they believe in racial barriers and thus, in the need for affirmative action. To test this theory, I aim to interview current students and administrators to get at the various interpretations of racial discrimination that are offered up. Putting my findings together, I’d like to assess where the affirmative action project resides and find ways to reframe the debate from that of a necessary evil, to one of positive policy.
Compared to affirmative action policies in the
The inspiration for the particular focus of my project stems from a quote I stumbled upon in a 2003 issue of The Economist, where a Brazilian named Jose Vicente was quoted saying, “Brazilian racism is like a gun at the back of the head rather than one pointed between the eyes.” As I pondered about the meaning of his words, I was only further compelled to unravel the ways in which racism affects Afro-Brazilians everyday, and further, I was moved to use this information to unravel the myth of racial democracy, which I feel works to keep affirmative action policies from fully being embraced.
1 comment:
Sara, I think this is you based on the topic...sorry if cookiemonkey is somebody other than Sara. =) Anyway, I realized after reading your blog that your topic is the entire reason I took intersectionalities (besides wanting to glean from Crenshaw's brilliance--I hope she's not reading this). I don't know if you remember but I said I want to learn how to respond to any argument people offer up against AA. Your idea of wanting to reframe AA so that it is not just a 'necessary evil' but a positive policy is along the same line (and I hope you brought the Luke Harris article). This means, you are going to have to engage people who are anti-AA. Though this may not seem like fun, I really hope you run with it because I think there is a lot to be learned from the people who hate or don't support AA. Maybe Julia or Camila can put you in touch with some of those plaintiffs in the lawsuits which resulted in decreasing the number of Black AA spots. Have fun and don't be shy!!! =)
Post a Comment